Improved through‐plane electrical conductivity in a carbon‐filled thermoplastic via foaming
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Flow‐induced orientation of the conductive fillers in injection molding creates parts with anisotropic electrical conductivity where through‐plane conductivity is several orders of magnitude lower than in‐plane conductivity. This article provides insight into a novel processing method using a chemical blowing agent to manipulate carbon fiber (CF) orientation within a polymer matrix during injection molding. The study used a fractional factorial experimental design to identify the important processing factors for improving the through‐plane electrical conductivity of plates molded from a carbon‐filled cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) containing 10 vol% CF and 2 vol% carbon black. The molded COC plates were analyzed for fiber orientation, morphology, and electrical conductivity. With increasing porosity in the molded foam part, it was found that greater out‐of‐plane fiber orientation and higher electrical conductivity could be achieved. Maximum conductivity and fiber reorientation in the through‐plane direction occurred at lower injection flow rate and higher melt temperature. These process conditions correspond with foam flow during filling of the mold cavity, indicating the importance of shear stress on the effectiveness of a fiber being rotated out‐of‐plane during injection molding. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it