MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977369538 · doi:10.1080/10236240701592104

The impact of a brominated flame retardant on smoltification and olfactory function in Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>L.) smolts

2007· article· en· W1977369538 on OpenAlexaff
N. Lower, Andrew D. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmoltificationSalmoBiologyFire retardantJuvenileZoologyFreshwater fishSeawaterSalmonidaeEcologyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite a reduction in exploitation of salmon stocks throughout the NE Atlantic, there continues to be a decline in many populations. The factors regulating these populations remain poorly understood, although there is evidence that environmental conditions experienced in freshwater can effect survival in the marine environment. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a brominated flame retardant (hexabromocyclododecane, HBCD) on the parr-smolt transformation in juvenile salmon. It is during this pre-adaptive period to marine life that olfactory imprinting to the natal river is considered to occur. Fish were exposed to low levels of HBCD for 30 days over the peak smoltification period in freshwater, and then transferred to clean seawater for 20 days. Fish were sampled weekly to assess changes in some of the physiological parameters associated with smoltification, and olfactory response to conspecific smolt urine was measured using an electro-olfactogram (EOG). Exposure to HBCD did not affect seawater adaptability, although there was some disruption of plasma thyroid hormone levels, as well as a reduction in olfactory function to conspecific smolt urine. The results are discussed in relation to the marine survival and successful homing of adult salmon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine and Freshwater Behaviour and PhysiologySame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207