The impact of a brominated flame retardant on smoltification and olfactory function in Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>L.) smolts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite a reduction in exploitation of salmon stocks throughout the NE Atlantic, there continues to be a decline in many populations. The factors regulating these populations remain poorly understood, although there is evidence that environmental conditions experienced in freshwater can effect survival in the marine environment. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a brominated flame retardant (hexabromocyclododecane, HBCD) on the parr-smolt transformation in juvenile salmon. It is during this pre-adaptive period to marine life that olfactory imprinting to the natal river is considered to occur. Fish were exposed to low levels of HBCD for 30 days over the peak smoltification period in freshwater, and then transferred to clean seawater for 20 days. Fish were sampled weekly to assess changes in some of the physiological parameters associated with smoltification, and olfactory response to conspecific smolt urine was measured using an electro-olfactogram (EOG). Exposure to HBCD did not affect seawater adaptability, although there was some disruption of plasma thyroid hormone levels, as well as a reduction in olfactory function to conspecific smolt urine. The results are discussed in relation to the marine survival and successful homing of adult salmon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".