MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977426079 · doi:10.1139/v01-126

Synthesis of trichiliasterones A and B 16-Ketosteroids isolated from <i>Trichilia hirta</i> and <i>Trichilia americana</i>

2001· article· en· W1977426079 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Susanne M. Hantos, Sasmita Tripathy, Najma Alibhai, Tony Durst

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhytochemical compounds biological activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryWittig reactionEnoneKetoneRing (chemistry)Degree of unsaturationStereochemistryEnolDouble bondTotal synthesisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The syntheses of trichiliasterone A (3β-hydroxypregnan-2,16-dione) and trichiliasterone B (2-hydroxyandrost-1,4-diene-3,16-dione) have been carried out starting from isoandrosterone and testosterone acetate, respectively. In each synthesis the functionality in the D ring was installed prior to working on ring A. In the case of trichiliasterone A, the D ring chemistry involved a Wittig reaction to generate the 17-methylene group, followed by SeO 2 oxidation to give an α,β-unsaturated ketone. Reaction with lithium dimethyl cuprate gave the required 17-ethyl-16-keto functionality. A 2,3-epoxy enol acetate served as the key intermediate for the generation of the 2-keto-3-hydroxy functions in ring A. The transposition of the keto function from C-16 to C-17 in the synthesis of trichiliasterone B was accomplished via oxymercuration–demercuration of the Δ 16—17 double bond followed by oxidation. The hydroxyl group at C-2 and the additional ring A unsaturation were introduced by lead tetra-acetate treatment of the 3-keto-4-enone function and subsequent air oxidation.Key words: 16-ketosteroids, plant steroids, Trichilia hirta, trichiliasterones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicPhytochemical compounds biological activitiesFrench-language works237,207