MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977444383 · doi:10.1086/586692

Ultraviolet Observations of the X‐Ray Photoionized Wind of Cygnus X‐1 during X‐Ray Soft/High State1

2008· article· en· W1977444383 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRADIUSPhotoionizationLuminosityAccretion (finance)UltravioletLine (geometry)Binary numberBlack hole (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-resolution ultraviolet observations of Cygnus X-1 were obtained at two epochs roughly 1 year apart using the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope . Orbital phase ranges around ϕ orb = 0 and 0.5 were covered at each epoch, and the spectra show P Cygni line features from high (N V, C IV, Si IV) and absorption lines from low (Si II, C II) ionization state material. The high-ionization P Cygni profiles show a marked dependence on orbital phase; strong, broad absorption components when the X-ray source is behind the companion star and noticeably weaker absorption when the X-ray source is between us and the companion star. We fit the P Cygni profiles using the Sobolev with exact integration method applied to a spherically symmetric stellar wind subject to X-ray photoionization from the black hole. Of the wind-formed lines, the Si IV doublet provides the most reliable estimates of the parameters of the wind and X-ray illumination. The velocity v increases with radius r (normalized to the stellar radius) according to v = v ∞ (1 − r ⋆ / r ) β , with β ≈ 0.75 and v ∞ ≈ 1420 km s −1 . Our fit implies a ratio of X-ray luminosity (in units of 10 38 erg s −1 ) to wind mass-loss rate (in units of 10 −6 M ☉ yr −1 ) of L X,38 / −6 ≈ 0.033, measured at −6 = 4.8. Our models determine parameters that may be used to estimate the accretion rate onto the black hole and independently predict the X-ray luminosity. Our predicted L X matches that determined by contemporaneous RXTE ASM remarkably well, but is a factor of 3 lower than the rate according to Bondi-Hoyle-Littleton spherical wind accretion. We suggest that some of the energy of accretion may go into powering a jet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207