Effect of trunk flexion on cervical muscle EMG to rear impacts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of occupant positioning on the response of the cervical muscles to whiplash-type posterolateral impacts. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent left posterolateral whiplash-type impacts with the volunteers seated "out-of-position". Electromyograms of the cervical muscles were recorded. RESULTS: Whether having the trunk flexed to the left or right at the time of impact, the muscle responses were low in magnitude, showing a trend to increasing EMG responses with increasing acceleration (P>0.05). The time to onset and time to peak electromyogram for most muscles showed a trend to progressively decrease with increasing levels of acceleration. With the subject flexed to the left, all muscles generated 31% or less of the maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram. With the subject flexed to the right, all muscles generated 27% or less of their maximal electromyogram. In both positions, the trapezii were the most active (P<0.05). Thus, having the trunk flexed out of neutral posture at the time of impact produces a very low magnitude cervical muscle response compared to impacts with the trunk in neutral posture. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of bodily impact, the flexed trunk posture appears to produce a biomechanical response that would probably decrease the likelihood of cervical muscle injury in low velocity posterolateral impacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".