MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Statistical Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasting in the South Saskatchewan River Basin by a Modified Nearest Neighbors Resampling

2009· article· en· W1977560442 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Adam Kenea Gobena, Thian Yew Gan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrologic Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Water NetworkUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsStreamflowClimatologySurface runoffConsensus forecastResamplingRange (aeronautics)Flood forecastingEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyDrainage basinScale (ratio)RegressionWater yearSnowStatisticsGeographyMathematicsGeologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ensemble seasonal streamflow forecasting model is developed for two watersheds in the South Saskatchewan River Basin of southern Alberta, Canada. The ensembles are generated from a mean forecast by using a modified K-nearest neighbor algorithm. The mean forecasts are produced by a robust M-regression model that uses snow water equivalent and large-scale climate information as predictors where the best combination of predictors is automatically selected by the generalized cross-validation criterion. It is shown that skillful forecasts of the April–September flow can be obtained as early as the beginning of December preceding the runoff year, thus extending the current forecast lead time by up to two months. An assessment of the potential economic value of the forecasts shows that with the same set of predictors, ensemble forecasts offer superior economic value for a wide range of end-users as compared to conditional median forecasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydrologic EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207