MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977617893 · doi:10.1086/426912

A Multiwavelength Study of IC 63 and IC 59

2005· article· en· W1977617893 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer L. Karr, A. Noriega‐Crespo, P. G. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalactic planeIonizationEmission spectrumSpectral lineGalaxyIonAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IC 63 and IC 59 are two nearby arc-shaped nebulae with relatively simple geometries and minimal obscuring material. The two regions, in spite of a similar projected distance from their ionizing star, have very different observational properties, both in continuum emission and in the presence and strength of line emission from molecular species. This paper conducts a multiwavelength study of the two regions using archived data from a variety of sources, including the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey and the Infrared Space Observatory . The multiwavelength morphology and structure of the two nebulae are studied in detail, particularly the ionization fronts in IC 63. The possibility of triggered star formation in IC 63 is investigated and determined to be spurious. H 2 and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission is detected in both IC 63 and IC 59, confirming the presence of molecular hydrogen in IC 59. The averaged line ratios are similar in the two regions, but variations are seen within each region. Temperatures and densities were calculated from the S(3) and S(5) pure rotational lines of molecular hydrogen. We derived a temperature of 630 K in IC 63, comparable to previous results, and a column density of 5.8 × 10 17 cm -2 , somewhat lower than previous values. New results for IC 59 show values of 590 K and 3.4 × 10 17 cm -2 , slightly cooler and with lower column density than IC 63. The contrast in appearance between IC 63 and IC 59 is consistent with a difference in actual (rather than projected) distances and a small variation in temperature and column density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207