MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977623581 · doi:10.1021/bi002460a

Cathepsins X and B Can Be Differentiated through Their Respective Mono- and Dipeptidyl Carboxypeptidase Activities

2001· article· en· W1977623581 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Therrien, Paule Lachance, Traian Sulea, Enrico O. Purisima, Hongtao Qi, Edmund Ziomek, Alejandro Álvarez‐Hernández, William Roush, Robert Ménard

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathepsin ACarboxypeptidaseCathepsin OCathepsinBiochemistryCathepsin BCathepsin CEnzymeChemistryDipeptideCleavage (geology)Cathepsin LProteasesStereochemistryAmino acidBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several new cysteine proteases of the papain family have been discovered in the past few years. To help in the assignment of physiological roles and in the design of specific inhibitors, a clear picture of the specificities of these enzymes is needed. One of these novel enzymes, cathepsin X, displays a unique specificity, cleaving single amino acid residues at the C-terminus of substrates very efficiently. In this study, the carboxypeptidase activities and substrate specificity of cathepsins X and B have been investigated in detail and compared. Using quenched fluorogenic substrates and HPLC measurements, it was shown that cathepsin X preferentially cleaves substrates through a monopeptidyl carboxypeptidase pathway, while cathepsin B displays a preference for the dipeptidyl pathway. The preference for one or the other pathway is about the same for both enzymes, i.e., approximately 2 orders of magnitude, a result supported by molecular modeling of enzyme-substrate complexes. Cleavage of a C-terminal dipeptide of a substrate by cathepsin X can become more important under conditions that preclude efficient monopeptidyl carboxypeptidase activity, e.g., nonoptimal interactions in subsites S(2)-S(1). These results confirm that cathepsin X is designed to function as a monopeptidyl carboxypeptidase. Contrary to a recent report [Klemencic, I., et al. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 5404-5412], it is shown that cathepsins X and B do not share similar activity profiles, and that reagents are available to clearly distinguish the two enzymes. In particular, CA074 was found to inactivate cathepsin B at least 34000-fold more efficiently than cathepsin X. The insights obtained from this and previous studies have been used to produce an inhibitor designed to exploit the unique structural features responsible for the carboxypeptidase activity of cathepsin X. Although of moderate potency, this E-64 derivative is the first reported example of a cathepsin X-specific inhibitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207