Overexpression of Androgen Receptors in Target Musculature Confers Androgen Sensitivity to Motoneuron Dendrites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dendritic arbors of spinal motoneurons are dynamically regulated by a variety of factors, and several lines of evidence indicate that trophic interactions with the target musculature are of central importance. In highly androgen-sensitive motoneuron populations, androgens are thought to regulate motoneuron dendrites through their action at the receptor-enriched target musculature. Using rats transgenically modified to overexpress androgen receptor (AR) in skeletal muscle, we directly tested the hypothesis that the enhanced expression of AR in the target musculature can underlie the androgenic regulation of motoneuron dendritic morphology. The morphology of motoneurons innervating the quadriceps muscle was examined in wild-type (WT) rats as well as in rats that had been transgenically modified to overexpress ARs in their skeletal musculature. Motoneurons innervating the vastus lateralis muscle of the quadriceps in gonadally intact male rats, and castrated males with or without androgen replacement, were labeled with cholera toxin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase, and dendritic arbors were reconstructed in three dimensions. In WT rats, quadriceps motoneuron dendrites were insensitive to hormonal manipulation. In contrast, quadriceps motoneuron dendrites in gonadally intact transgenic males were larger than those of WT males. Furthermore, overexpression of ARs in the quadriceps muscle resulted in androgen sensitivity in dendrites, with substantial reductions in dendritic length occurring after castration; this reduction was prevented with testosterone replacement. Thus, it appears that the androgen sensitivity of motoneuron dendrites is conferred indirectly via the enrichment of ARs in the musculature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".