Re: Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Sham Efficacy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Results From the SUmiT Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyLetter to the Editor/Errata1 Jan 2011Re: Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Sham Efficacy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Results From the SUmiT TrialK. M. Peters, D. J. Carrico, R. A. Perez-Marrero, A. U. Khan, L. S. Wooldridge, G. L. Davis and S. A. MacDiarmid J Urol 2010; 183: 1438–1443 Diane Civic and Edgar Black Diane CivicDiane Civic More articles by this author and Edgar BlackEdgar Black More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.030AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 : Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus extended-release tolterodine: results from the Overactive Bladder Innovative Therapy Trial. J Urol2009; 182: 1055. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Long-term durability of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of overactive bladder. J Urol2010; 183: 234. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Evaluation of long term therapy with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for overactive bladder syndrome (STEP). NCT00928385http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Google Scholar 4 : The relationship between subjective and objective assessments of sacral neuromodulation effectiveness in patients with urgency-frequency. Neurourol Urodyn2008; 27: 775. Google Scholar 5 : Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol2003; 189: 98. Google Scholar 6 Mostafa A, Hassafa Z and Abdel-Fattah M: Can the patient global impression of improvement questionnaire predict the results of long quality of life and sexual function questionnaires? Presented at joint annual meeting of International Continence Society and International Urogynecological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August 23–27, 2010. Google Scholar 7 : Trospium chloride improves overactive bladder symptoms: a multicenter phase III trial. J Urol2004; 171: 2311. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and tolerability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine for overactive bladder: results of the OPERA trial. Mayo Clin Proc2003; 78: 687. Google Scholar 9 : Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res1994; 3: 7. Google Scholar 10 : Discontinuation rates of anticholinergic medications used for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. Obstet Gynecol2008; 112: 1311. Google Scholar © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 1January 2011Page: 362-364 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Diane Civic More articles by this author Edgar Black More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".