MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977686319 · doi:10.1143/jpsjs.74s.277

Confinement and Critical Regime in Doped Frustrated Quasi-One Dimensional Magnets

2005· article· en· W1977686319 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Laflorencie, Didier Poilblanc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Physical Society of Japan · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsSpinsPhysicsSpin (aerodynamics)AnisotropyMonte Carlo methodScalingSpin modelEffective field theoryQuantum Monte CarloExchange interactionGround stateSeries expansionMagnetFerromagnetismQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ground state and finite temperature properties of a system of coupled frustrated and/or dimerized spin-1/2 chains modeling e.g. the CuGeO$_3$ compound are reviewed. Special emphasis is put on the investigation of the role of impurity doping. A c hain-mean field computation combining exact diagonalisations of the chain hamiltonians together with a mean field treatment of the weak interchain couplings is performed in order to map the microscopic model onto a low-energy effective model. The latter descr ibes a 2-dimensional system of effective spin-1/2 local moments interacting by spacially anisotropic long range spin exchange interactions. An extensive study of this effective model is performed by Stocastic Series Expansion Quantum Monte Carlo for a wide range of temperatures and impurity concentrations. Interesting scaling behaviors of the uniform and staggered spin susceptibilities (above a small ordering Neel temperature due to a residual 3D coupling) can be interpreted in terms of the formation of large clusters of correlated spins carrying a finite magnetization. Such results are reproduced satisfactorily by a new Real Space RG enabling to deal with long range interactions in two-dimensions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Physical Society of JapanSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207