MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977692458 · doi:10.1300/j094v09n04_03

Pain Experience and Learned Helplessness in Women with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome and Women with Fibromyalgia: A Descriptive and Comparative Study

2001· article· en· W1977692458 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Britta Strömbeck, R. Manthorpe, L. Jacobsson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Musculoskeletal Pain · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLearned helplessnessFibromyalgiaMcGill Pain QuestionnaireFibromyalgia syndromePhysical therapyRheumatologyInternal medicineVisual analogue scaleClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective. To describe the experience of pain and learned helplessness in women with primary Sjögren's syndrome [prim SS], to compare the experiences with those of women with fibromyalgia syndrome [FMS] and to investigate the prevalence of FMS in a random sample from a cohort of prim SS patients.Methods. Forty-three patients with prim SS, also examined for FMS according to the American College of Rheumatology 1990 [ACR-90] criteria, and 44 patients with FMS completed a questionnaire including the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [SF-MPQ], a body map for pain drawing, Arthritis Helplessness Index [AHI], and questions about pain fluctuation, drug use, and functional status.Results. Thirty-six [84 percent] of the prim SS patients experienced pain and eight [19 percent] also fulfilled the ACR-criteria for FMS. The patients with prim SS and pain experienced lower pain intensity than the FMS patients according to the intensity scores included in SF-MPQ, i.e., visual analog scale [P = 0.016], present pain intensity [P = 0.004] and intensity of the pain descriptors [P < 0.001]. The prim SS patients also used fewer pain descriptors [P < 0.001] and had a lower pain drawing score [P < 0.001] than the FMS patients. No differences were seen in AHI, pain fluctuation, and functional status. The pain distribution differed between the groups with a tendency to a more central distribution in patients with FMS and a more peripheral distribution in those with prim SS. The eight subjects fulfilling the ACR-90 criteria for FMS had similiar results for pain assessments as the pure FMS group.Conclusion. The study suggests an increased prevalence of FMS and the presence of [at least] two patterns of pain in prim SS patients, one that is similiar to FMS and another that is less intensive and has a tendency to a more peripheral distribution. The therapeutic approach may differ in the two subgroups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Musculoskeletal PainSame topicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchFrench-language works237,207