MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977734987 · doi:10.1089/107999000312603

Transtracheal Administration of Interleukin-12 Induces Neutrophil Responses in the Murine Lung

2000· article· en· W1977734987 on OpenAlexaff
Zsuzsanna Papp, Dorothy M. Middleton, Christine M Røntved, Marianna Földvári, John Gordon, Maria E. Baca‐Estrada

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interferon & Cytokine Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Science Council
KeywordsNasal administrationBronchoalveolar lavageChemotaxisRespiratory tractImmunologyLungInterleukinInfiltration (HVAC)MedicineRespiratory systemCytokineReceptorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the roles of interleukin-12 (IL-12) in the immunomodulation of antigen-specific responses are well characterized, the effects of IL-12 on the respiratory tract following mucosal administration are not well defined. Therefore, we investigated changes in the murine lung shortly after intranasal (i.n.) administration of murine IL-12. We showed that IL-12 induced neutrophil influx to the murine lung in both C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. Histologic examination revealed that intranasal administration of IL-12 with liposomes induced focal neutrophil infiltration into the alveoli and a significant increase in neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids when compared with administration of liposomes alone. In vitro chemotaxis assays indicated that the observed pulmonary neutrophil response induced by IL-12 could have been due in part to the direct chemotactic activity of IL-12 for murine neutrophils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Interferon & Cytokine ResearchSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207