Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression promotes renal ischemia-reperfusion injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) catabolizes tryptophan to N-formyl kynurenine and has a proapoptotic role in renal tubular epithelial cells (TEC) in response to IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha in vitro. TEC produce abundant amounts of IDO in vitro in response to inflammation but a pathological role for IDO in renal injury remains unknown. We investigated the role of IDO in a mouse model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). IRI was induced by clamping the renal pedicle of C57BL/6 mice for 45 min at 32 degrees C. Here, we demonstrate upregulation of IDO in renal tissue at 2 h after reperfusion which reached maximal levels at 24 h. Inhibition of IDO following IRI prevented the increase in serum creatinine observed in vehicle-treated mice (86.4 +/- 25 micromol/l, n = 11) compared with mice treated with 1-methyl-D-tryptophan, a specific inhibitor of IDO (33.7 +/- 8.7 micromol/l, n = 10, P = 0.031). The role of IDO in renal IRI was further supported by results in IDO-KO mice which maintained normal serum creatinine levels (32.5 +/- 2.0 micromol/l, n = 6) following IRI compared with wild-type mice (123 +/- 30 micromol/l, n = 9, P = 0.008). Our data suggest that attenuation of IDO expression within the kidney may represent a novel strategy to reduce renal injury as a result of ischemia reperfusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".