The Evaluation of Open-hole Completions for Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Wells In a Heavily Karsted and Fractured Carbonate Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Upper Devonian Grosmont Formation, located in the West Athabasca Oil Sands Deposit, contains an estimated 406 billion barrels of bitumen. The reservoir is a heavily karsted and fractured, bitumen-saturated carbonate. Initial thermal horizontal well development is currently underway in this resource. These horizontal wells have similar logistics, well construction and materials challenges to those in the McMurray Formation. Laricina has been actively developing the Grosmont Formation. Production from the pilot began in 2011 and many lessons have been learned. The next phase of development is a 10,700 bbl/day commercial project scheduled for first steam in 2014. The Grosmont, despite many drilling challenges such as severe lost circulation, also provides many opportunities not typically achievable in clastic oil sands developments. Carbonate rock is typically a good candidate for open-hole completions due to its geomechanical properties. This paper will discuss the geomechanical investigation evaluating borehole stability during drilling and completion, steam injection and production operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".