MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977802703 · doi:10.1080/03014220909510564

Lateral moraine age in Park Valley, Tararua Range, New Zealand

2009· article· en· W1977802703 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Martin Brook

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMassey UniversityRoyal Society Te ApārangiVictoria University of WellingtonRoyal SocietyUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsMoraineGeologyGlacial periodCirqueTerminal moraineTephraLoessGeomorphologyBedrockDeglaciationPhysical geographyLandformPaleontologyGeochemistryGeographyVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent geomorphologie and sedimentologic investigations in Park Valley, in the central Tararua Range, have identified several landforms of glacial erosion and deposition, including cirque basins, a U‐shaped glacial valley, and a lateral moraine ridge. The presence of Kawakawa tephra (Aokautere Ash) within loess c. 50 cm beneath the surface of the moraine has indicated that the moraine was formed prior to 27 ka, suggesting late MIS 3 glaciation in this sector of New Zealand. However, recently published 10 Be cos‐mogenic dates from glacially‐scoured bedrock and an erratic block on the surface of the moraine indicate that glaciation was much later, the corollary being that the Kawakawa tephra has been re‐distributed post‐eruption, perhaps from the ridgelines surrounding the moraine. Here, two optically‐stimulated luminescence ages on the loess are reported that suggests most of the moraine was formed during late MIS 3 or early MIS 2, and that a readvance at c. 17.7–18.7 ka extended as far as the moraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Society of New ZealandSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207