MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977841198 · doi:10.2118/87630-pa

Pilot Testing of a New Generation of Induced Gas Flotation Equipment

2004· article· en· W1977841198 on OpenAlexaff
Shaya Movafaghian, James Chen, Stephen Scott Wheeler, R. W. Guidry

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production & Facilities · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringPetroleumSubmarine pipelinePilot testEngineeringFossil fuelProcess (computing)Process engineeringWaste managementEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringComputer scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Induced gas flotation (IGF) technology is well-known in the oil industry for effectively treating produced water to meet environmental oil-in-water discharge requirements. This paper presents technical considerations for development of a new generation of IGF units, a discussion of the process kinetics, actual operating data, and performance analysis of a full-sized, four-cell WEMCO* cylindrical depurator. A pilot test program was developed and executed in collaboration with ChevronTexaco Overseas Petroleum on platformgathering-station Mike, located offshore in the Cabinda Province, Angola. Pilot data indicate that the flotation kinetic rate for oil removal from a four-cell cylindrical depurator is comparable with a conventional depurator. Cylindrical depurator design captures the main technical advantage of conventional, mechanical IGF units for effective oil-particle flotation and offers the promise of fewer maintenance issues as well as viable alternatives for higher-pressure applications. Field data validate theoretical predictions for the performance of the cylindrical depurator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Production & FacilitiesSame topicMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207