MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977873640 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2010.0836

Blind channel estimation and discrete speed tracking in wireless systems using independent component analysis with particle filtering

2012· article· en· W1977873640 on OpenAlex
S. Alireza Banani, Rodney G. Vaughan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Particle filterKalman filterMIMOAlgorithmBlock (permutation group theory)Benchmark (surveying)Bit error rateWirelessReal-time computingControl theory (sociology)MathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For high data rate multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, a joint blind channel estimation and data recovery algorithm is presented for where the relative speed of the transmit/receive terminals may change. This changing speed is called manoeuvering. The blind technique is based on non-stationary independent component analysis with a generalised exponential density function to separate each source signal, and it uses particle filtering to track the time-varying channel. The presented technique also uses a hard decision switching block which adaptively selects between discrete speeds of a manoeuvering terminal. The speed can be therefore tracked within a mobile data communication link, that is, by using only the received data information signal. The performance is evaluated by simulation and is compared with optimal coherent detection as benchmark. A large degradation in system error performance is observed if the switching block is disabled within the algorithm, confirming its advantage. Moreover, to assess the impact of the presented blind channel estimation on system error performance more directly, a fair comparison with a known blind technique based on Kalman filtering and two known pilot-aided systems is presented with the assumption of non-manoeuvering terminals. Improved performance is observed using the presented technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it