New report of<i>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</i>causing postbloom fruit drop on citrus in Bermuda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Postbloom fruit drop (PFD) of citrus was observed for the first time after a widespread and severe outbreak occurred in Bermuda in the 1990s. Fruit losses from the disease were estimated at 25% to 35% in sweet orange, grapefruit, lemon and Tahiti lime. The causal agent of PFD has been reported as either Colletotrichum gloeosporioides or Colletotrichum acutatum. Bermuda isolates of Colletotrichum recovered from diseased orange trees produced lesions typical of PFD in detached petals of orange, lime and grapefruit, and in attached orange blossoms. The isolates produced few to no lesions of anthracnose on leaves of key lime seedlings. Koch's postulates were fulfilled following reisolation of morphologically identical fungi from inoculated tissues. The isolates were characterized using morphological (conidial size and shape and colony colour), physiological (growth rate at 24 °C and on a benomyl-amended medium), immunological (ELISA) and molecular (PCR amplification and sequencing of the ITS region) methods. Immunological and molecular techniques provided definitive identification of the isolates as Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. This report confirms that C. gloeosporioides can be the causal agent of PFD; therefore, identification of the causal agent to species by immunology, molecular analysis and fungicide sensitivity is suggested for new outbreaks of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".