MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977891454 · doi:10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.210

Evaluation of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein‐2 on the Repair of Alveolar Ridge Defects in Baboons

2005· article· en· W1977891454 on OpenAlexaff
Dario A. Oliveira Miranda, Neil M. Blumenthal, Rachel G. Sorensen, John M. Wozney, Ulf M. E. Wikesjö

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Periodontology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Chicago
KeywordsAlveolar ridgeBaboonBone morphogenetic proteinRidgeDental alveolusDentistryCoronal planeRecombinant DNABone formationBiomedical engineeringChemistryAnatomyMedicineMaterials scienceSurgeryInternal medicineBiologyImplant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate alveolar ridge augmentation following surgical implantation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) using two novel space-providing carrier technologies in the baboon (Papio anubis) model. METHODS: Standardized alveolar ridge defects ( approximately 15 x 8 x 5 mm) were surgically produced in maxillary and mandibular edentulous areas in four baboons. The defect sites were implanted with rhBMP-2 (0.4 mg/mL) in a tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite/ absorbable collagen sponge composite (TCP/HA/ACS) or calcium phosphate cement (alpha-BSM). Control treatments were TCP/HA/ACS and ?-BSM without rhBMP-2 and sham surgery. Stainless steel pins were placed at the mid-apical and coronal level of the defect sites to provide landmarks for clinical measurements pre- and post-implantation. Impressions were obtained pre- and postimplantation to determine changes in alveolar ridge volume. Radiographic registrations were obtained pre- and post-implantation. Block sections of the defect sites were harvested at week 16 postimplantation and processed for histometric analysis including new bone area and bone density. Statistical comparisons between treatments were made using a mixed effect generalized linear model using least squares estimation. RESULTS: The carrier systems without rhBMP-2 provided a modest ridge augmentation. The addition of rhBMP-2 resulted in an almost 2-fold increase in alveolar ridge width, including a greater percentage of trabecular bone and a higher bone density compared to controls (P < or =0.05) without significant differences between the two rhBMP-2 protocols. CONCLUSIONS: TCP/HA/ACS and alphaBSM appear to be suitable carrier technologies for rhBMP-2. Alveolar augmentation procedures using either technology combined with rhBMP-2, rather than stand-alone therapies, may provide clinically relevant augmentation of alveolar ridge defects for placement of endosseous dental implants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PeriodontologySame topicDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207