Novel, Potent ORL-1 Receptor Agonist Peptides Containing α-Helix-Promoting Conformational Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ORL-1 receptor has recently been cloned and is implicated in a wide variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Toward the goal of elucidating important features of the receptor-bound conformation of the endogenous ligand, nociceptin (NC), several conformationally constrained analogues were prepared. Either alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) or N-methylalanine (MeAla) were inserted as replacement(s) for Ala7, Ala11, or Ala15 in the native NC sequence (FGGFTGARKSARKLANQ). In vitro assays measuring human ORL-1 receptor affinity (competition binding against [3H] NC), functional potency ([35S]GTP gamma S), and efficacy (as compared to NC) were performed for each new peptide. The receptor affinities of the Aib-containing peptides generally matched NC, showing K(i)'s in the range of 0.1-0.5 nM. By comparison, the receptor affinities of the MeAla-containing peptides were significantly diminished. Peptide 14 (FGGFTG[Aib]RKS[Aib]RKLANQ-NH2), which contains two constrained alanine residues (positions 7 and 11) and a C-terminal amide modification, was found to be a very potent agonist with K(i) = 0.05 nM and EC50 = 0.08 nM in the human ORL-1 assays. The data support a hypothesis that the receptor-bound form of NC might adopt an amphipathic helix in the "address" segment of the sequence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".