Introgression of wheat chromosome 2D or 5D into tritordeum leads to free-threshing habit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hexaploid tritordeum is the amphiploid derived from the cross between the diploid wild barley Hordeum chilense and durum wheat. The non-free-threshing habit is a constraint to this species becoming a new crop. Three tritordeum lines (HT374, HT376, and HT382) showing the free-threshing habit were selected from crosses between tritordeum and bread wheat. All three lines were euploids, as revealed by mitotic chromosome counting. Genomic in situ hybridization analysis made it possible to distinguish differences among these lines. While the line HT382 carries only 10 chromosomes from H. chilense, the lines HT374 and HT376 have 12. These results suggest that HT382 is a double chromosome substitution line between H. chilense and the wheat D genome, while HT374 and HT376 each have one pair of H. chilense (Hch) chromosomes substituted by wheat D chromosomes. Molecular characterization revealed that HT382 is a 1D/(1Hch), 2D/(2Hch) chromosome substitution line, whereas HT374 and HT376 have 5D/(5Hch) substitutions. On the basis of previous knowledge, it seems that the absence of chromosome 2Hch or 5Hch is more important for producing the free-threshing habit than the presence of chromosome 2D or 5D, while chromosome 1Hch seems to be unrelated to the trait. These free-threshing tritordeum lines constitute an important advance in the tritordeum breeding program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".