MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ultra-Mild Wear of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Fibre and Particle Reinforced Magnesium Matrix Composites

2012· article· en· W1977946996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAbrasion (mechanical)Composite materialParticle (ecology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Alloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sliding wear behaviour of Mg alloy AM60 reinforced with Al 2 O 3 fibers and particles, i.e, AM60-9% (Al 2 O 3 ) f and AM60-(9% (Al 2 O 3 ) f + 4% (Al 2 O 3 ) p ) have been studied by performing boundary lubricated pin on disk tests against AISI 52100 steel counterface under low loads (1.0-5.0 N). The results showed that the material loss from Mg composites tested under 1.0 N and 2.0 N loads was negligible. Under 5.0 N load and after 1.0×10 5 sliding cycles, AM60-9% (Al 2 O 3 ) f showed increased volumetric loss whereas under the same conditions AM60-(9% (Al 2 O 3 ) f + 4% (Al 2 O 3 ) p ) continued to protect the Mg-matrix from damage by the counterface as Al 2 O 3 fibre+particle height remained exposed over the Mg matrix by 1.8 μm and acted as load bearing elements. Transfer of Fe particles to the worn surface of Mg composites resulting from extensive counterface damage due to abrasion by hard Al 2 O 3 fibres and particles was also detected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it