MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977998154 · doi:10.1115/pvp2005-71303

Testing and Risk Analysis are Key Elements of Post Construction Problem Solving: A Case History of System Failure and Fire Hazards

2005· article· en· W1977998154 on OpenAlexaff
S. J. Brown, Eldon Husband, Jerry L. Lyons

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipingEngineeringHazardous wasteDamagesTurbineCabin pressurizationForensic engineeringFault tree analysisCatastrophic failureRisk analysis (engineering)Environmental scienceWaste managementReliability engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hazardous thermal hydraulic loading conditions and unintended plant shut downs from turbine trips that are identified shortly after a plant start up may be the tip of the iceberg of even greater interrelated hazards and costly damages. This paper presents a case study to further illustrate (from ASME PVP2002-1124 paper) additional considerations for the testing and risk analysis to identify a systematic approach to reduce the hazards and risks of equipment failure from thermal hydraulic forces and secondary hazards (such as fires) to the plant and personnel. This paper examines problems of turbine trip caused by fuel computer controlled regulator valves that results in thermal hydraulic forces from compressor pressure wave surges in the process system that result in piping “Y” fitting (45° laterals) failures in the process piping from crack growth and brittle fracture which lead to process chemical release and fires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207