MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Increased Persistent Sodium Currents in Rat Entorhinal Cortex Layer V Neurons in a Post–Status Epilepticus Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

2003· article· en· W1978089814 on OpenAlexaff
Newton Agrawal, Ángel Alonso, David S. Ragsdale

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatus epilepticusEpilepsyEntorhinal cortexTemporal lobeNeuroscienceHippocampusMedicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Spontaneous seizures in rats emerge several weeks after induction of status epilepticus with pharmacologic treatment or electrical stimulation, providing an animal model for human temporal lobe epilepsy. In this study, we investigated whether status epilepticus caused changes in the function of voltage-gated sodium channels in entorhinal cortex layer V neurons, a cellular group important for the genesis of limbic seizures. METHODS: We induced status epilepticus in rats, by using lithium-pilocarpine, and then 2-12 weeks later, used whole-cell voltage-clamp to examine voltage-activated sodium currents of acutely dissociated layer V neurons. RESULTS: Transient sodium currents of entorhinal cortex layer V neurons isolated from 9- to 12-week post-status epilepticus rats were similar to currents in age-matched controls; however, low-threshold persistent sodium currents were significantly larger. This increase in persistent activity was not seen 2-3 weeks after pilocarpine treatment; thus it occurred after a delay comparable to the delay in the appearance of spontaneous seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Increased persistent currents are expected to accentuate neuronal excitability and thus may contribute to the genesis of spontaneous seizures after status epilepticus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207