MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978091456 · doi:10.1021/jp0123839

Thermodynamics of Interaction between Cationic Gemini Surfactants and Hydrophobically Modified Polymers in Aqueous Solutions

2002· article· en· W1978091456 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantCationic polymerizationAqueous solutionChemistryIsothermal microcalorimetryPolymerPolymer chemistrySodium dodecyl sulfateAcrylic acidBromideChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryEnthalpyThermodynamicsCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microcalorimetry has been used to study the interactions between two gemini surfactants, [C 12 H 25 (CH 3 ) 2 N(CH 2 ) S N(CH 3 ) 2 C 12 H 25 ]Br 2, with S = 3 and 6, and several modified poly(acrylamides) (PAM) including hydrophobic groups and acrylic acid residues. Values of enthalpies, entropies, and free energies of interaction have been derived for the two gemini surfactants and two single-chain surfactants, sodium dodecyl sulfate and dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide. The interaction with the polymers was found to be much stronger for the geminis in comparison with the single-chain surfactants and was also found to be strongly dependent on the spacer length. Inclusion of acrylic acid residues in hydrophobically modified PAMs generates a strong specific interaction between polymer and gemini surfactant that acts to disrupt the aggregation of the surfactant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it