Can stunned hearts be resuscitated? Evaluation of aspartate/glutamate secondary blood cardioplegia using magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: Reperfusion of ischemic hearts with warm, substrate-enriched, blood cardioplegia may alleviate post-ischemic metabolic and functional derangements. This study investigates this possibility using (31)P magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy. Methods: Fifteen blood-perfused Langendorff pig hearts were subjected to 30 min of total, normothermic ischemia. Control hearts (n=8) were reperfused with blood for 40 min. Experimental hearts (n=7) received 20 min of aspartate/glutamate (asp/glu) enriched blood cardioplegic solution, followed by 20 min of normal blood. (31)P MR spectroscopy was used to observe cellular energetics and intracellular pH (pHi) throughout the experiments. Left-ventricular function and myocardial oxygen consumption were evaluated before and after ischemia. Results: MR spectra showed no improvement in the rate or extent of high-energy phosphate recovery with asp/glu cardioplegia, but showed a transient increase in pHi during cardioplegic reperfusion (p<0.05). This, however, did not affect post-ischemic recovery of high energy metabolites, myocardial function or oxygen consumption. Conclusions: This study raises questions regarding the potential beneficial effects of asp/glu enriched secondary cardioplegic solution on functional or metabolic status of stunned pig hearts. Extrapolation of these results to humans should be viewed with caution. Keywords: Magnetic resonance; Pig heart; Aspartate; Glutamate; Cardioplegia; Myocardial stunning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".