MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978169185 · doi:10.1080/13573320701780506

Masculinities in Physical Recreation: the (re)production of masculinist discourses in vocational education

2007· article· en· W1978169185 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Seth Brown, Doune Macdonald

Bibliographic record

VenueSport Education and Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports, Gender, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationRecreationSociologyApprenticeshipPhysical educationPower (physics)PedagogyPolitical scienceGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Educators have criticised vocational education in Australia and elsewhere for being gendered and classed, thereby not giving those students who choose to undertake this form of study the broadening of opportunities envisioned (e.g., Falk, 1999 Falk, I. 1999. The convergence of vocational and adult education in learning communities. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23: 697–716. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]; Huws, 2000 Huws, U. 2000. “The changing gender division of labour in the transition to the knowledge society”. In Transition to the knowledge society: policies and strategies for individual participation and learning, Edited by: Rubenson, K. and Schuetze, H. G. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Institute for European Studies. [Google Scholar]; Host & Michelson, 2001 Host, H. and Michelsen, S. 2001. “The new careworker: expanding the apprentice system into new fields of work”. In Gender perspectives on vocational education, Edited by: Gonon, P., Haefeli, K., Heikkinen, A. and Ludwig, I. Bern: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]). Recently, the Queensland Studies Authority (formally the Queensland Board of Senior Secondary School Studies) implemented the subject Physical Recreation, a new stream of vocational education. The aim of this study was to examine how power operates in two Physical Recreation case study schools using Foucault's techniques of power. Qualitative data were collected using field notes from observations, interviews using partially constructed questions and supplementary materials. The data collected were clustered into key themes addressing masculinities (re)produced by the Physical Recreation teachers and students. The discourses within these themes that position both teachers and students in particular power relationships were deconstructed using Foucault's techniques of power. The paper concludes that Physical Recreation perpetuated a male hierarchy that favoured elite athletes and offered limited educative experiences to the majority of students.1 Dr. Seth Brown undertook this work while he was a PhD student at The University of Queensland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSport Education and SocietySame topicSports, Gender, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207