Évaluation de la croissance et des dommages hivernaux de <i>Thuja occidentalis</i> L. et de cinq de ses cultivars en réponse aux diverses conditions climatiques du nord-est canadien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
valuation de la croissance et des dommages hivernaux de Thuja occidentalis L. et de cinq de ses cultivars en rponse aux diverses conditions climatiques du nord-est canadien. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82: 169-175. De jeunes plants de Thuja occidentalis L. et de cinq de ses cultivars ont t implants en 1991 dans des sites reprsentant diffrentes zones climatiques du nord-est canadien (2 5). Ces plants ont t observs pendant 5 annes dans le but de vrifier leur potentiel de tolrance sous diverses conditions climatiques. Les dommages hivernaux observs chaque printemps montrent que le potentiel d'acclimatation aux conditions hivernales de Thuja occidentalis L. diffre au sein de ses cultivars. Les cultivars Holmstrup, Mastersii et Lutescens ont dmontr une tolrance au froid similaire l'espce-type; toutefois, Mastersii a montr une croissance plus importante que les deux autres cultivars en zone 2a. Le cultivar Cloth of Gold a t le plus affect par les conditions hivernales et le cultivar Globosa Aurea a donn des rsultats intermdiaires. De plus, la croissance en hauteur et en largeur des plants de l'espce-type et de chacun de ses cultivars a t influence par les conditions climatiques des sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".