Early patterned stimulation leads to changes in adult behavior and gene expression in <i>C. elegans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Across phylogeny, early experience plays a critical role in nervous system development. In these experiments, we investigated the long-term effects that specific patterns of sensory experience during development had on the biology and function of the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. The delivery of a specific pattern of mechanosensory stimulation in the first larval stage (L1) produced significant enhancement in the tap withdrawal behavioral response, expression patterns of an ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) subunit and mRNA levels for that receptor in 3-day-old adult worms and a depression of these same three measures in 5-day-old adult worms. A critical period for the 3-day enhanced behavior and GLR distribution was observed in L1, whereas there was no critical period for the depressed effects observed in 5-day-old worms. The spaced pattern of stimulation was essential for expression of this effect: Various forms of massed training produced neither the enhancement at 3 days nor the depression at 5 days. The 5-day depressed behavioral response had many features in common with long-term memory, including sensitivity to disruption following retrieval. The different behavioral and molecular effects that early patterned mechanosensory stimulation produced in 3 and 5-day-old worms led us to hypothesize that separate cellular phenomena produced the enhanced 3-day and depressed 5-day behaviors and molecular effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".