Digestive Enzyme Development in Newborn Piglets Born of Sows Immunized against Somatostatin and/or Receiving Growth Hormone-Releasing Factor during Gestation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thirty-eight second parity sows were either immunized (IMM) against somatostatin (SRIF) and/or injected with growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) during gestation. Treatment effects on pancreatic, gastric and duodenal development as well as on digestive enzyme activity of piglets at birth (before suckling) or at 24 h postpartum were investigated. Birth weights of piglets were similar across treatments (p > 0.1). Weight, DNA, RNA, total protein content and enzyme activity for all three organs increased between birth and 24 h postpartum (p < 0.01), except for pancreatic RNA and chymotrypsin which decreased (p < 0.01), and protein content of the pancreas which was unaltered (p > 0.1). Gastric RNA, pancreatic weight:DNA, RNA:DNA and amylase:DNA ratios were increased in 1-day-old piglets from SRIF-IMM sows (p < or = 0.05). GRF only had significant effects (p < 0.05) on the maltase:DNA ratio, which it decreased. Yet, there were tendencies (p < 0.1) for duodenal weight, DNA and total protein content to be increased in piglets from GRF-injected dams. It is therefore apparent that major developmental changes of the pancreas, stomach and duodenum of piglets take place during the first 24 h postpartum. Injections of GRF and/or immunization against SRIF during gestation in swine also have several effects on digestive enzyme activity of neonatal pigs. Yet, the physiological implications of these early changes are not clear at the present time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".