Inosine and equilibrative nucleoside transporter 2 contribute to hypoxic preconditioning in the murine cardiomyocyte HL-1 cell line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purine nucleoside adenosine is a physiologically important molecule in the heart. Brief exposure of cardiomyocytes to hypoxic challenge results in the production of extracellular adenosine, which then interacts with adenosine receptors to activate compensatory signaling pathways that lead to cellular resistance to subsequence hypoxic challenge. This phenomenon is known as preconditioning (PC), and, while adenosine is clearly involved, other components of the response are less well understood. Flux of nucleosides, such as adenosine and inosine, across cardiomyocyte membranes is dependent on equilibrative nucleoside transporters 1 and 2 (ENT1 and ENT2). We have previously shown in the murine cardiomyocyte HL-1 cell line that hypoxic challenge leads to an increase in intracellular adenosine, which exits the cell via ENT1 and preconditions via A1 and A3 adenosine receptor-dependent mechanisms. However, the role and contribution of inosine and ENT2 are unclear. In this study, we confirmed that ENT1 and ENT2 are both capable of transporting inosine. Moreover, we found that hypoxic challenge leads to a significant increase in levels of intracellular inosine, which exits the cell via both ENT1 and ENT2. Exogenously added inosine (5 microM) preconditions cardiomyocytes in an A1 adenosine receptor-dependent manner since preconditioning can be blocked by the A1 adenosine receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (1 microM) but not the A3 adenosine receptor antagonist MRS-1220 (200 nM). These data suggest that cardiomyocyte responses to hypoxic PC are more complex than previously thought, involving both adenosine and inosine and differing, but overlapping, contributions of the two ENT isoforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".