MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978330130 · doi:10.1002/cmr.a.10053

EROICA: Exploring regions of interest with cluster analysis in large functional magnetic resonance imaging data sets

2003· article· en· W1978330130 on OpenAlex
Mark Jarmasz, Ray Somorjai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTime seriesSpurious relationshipPattern recognition (psychology)Data miningNoise (video)Functional magnetic resonance imagingArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMachine learningPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We describe a divide and conquer strategy for an exploratory data analysis (EDA) of large functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data sets. The need for an EDA to precede and complement a confirmatory model‐based analysis is now well established. For complex fMRI experiments, where a prior model of the expected response cannot be posited, the sole option is to conduct an initial EDA. An EDA often discovers unanticipated behavior, allowing the experimenter to augment or even change the original hypothesis. In addition, the gross artifact behavior that EDA makes evident may aid the experimenter in deciding whether the data set is even usable, some additional preprocessing step is required, or the one used has introduced spurious effects. The proposed strategy, named EROICA for exploring regions of interest with cluster analysis, evolved from an empirical observation that a typical cluster of activation or artifact time series can be partitioned into three subsets: time series corrupted by significant trends and time series above and below some noise level. Moreover, the sought‐after common temporal behavior among the cluster time series can be extracted in an uncorrupted form from the above noise level time series alone. Thus, the key feature of EROICA is the initial partition of the data set into trendy and below the noise level time series, followed by the fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA) of the above the noise level time series to extract common cluster behavior patterns (centroids). The initial partition is based on a test statistic in the power spectrum domain. This step has significant ramifications: it greatly speeds up the FCA because of the much smaller number of time series to cluster; it makes the clustering results more robust because they are no longer affected by the trendy and noisy time series; the above the noise level time series can be further grouped according to the location of the spectral peak on the frequency axis, and these groups can be used to create a subset of initial centroids that greatly improves the convergence rate of the FCA; and the group of below the noise level time series (referred to as the noise pool) can be used as a data‐driven representation of the underlying noise source. In the final step, each time series is modeled as a linear combination of the closest centroid plus noise. The noise pool is very convenient for obtaining thresholds when testing the significance of the model parameter without having to model or assume the distributional properties of the underlying noise source. To limit the number of false positives in the activation maps, the significance test also tests the time series power spectrum values at the frequency locations determined by the cluster centroid. EROICA is one of the analysis options offered by the general image‐processing package EvIdent®. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson 16A: 50–62, 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it