EROICA: Exploring regions of interest with cluster analysis in large functional magnetic resonance imaging data sets
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract We describe a divide and conquer strategy for an exploratory data analysis (EDA) of large functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data sets. The need for an EDA to precede and complement a confirmatory model‐based analysis is now well established. For complex fMRI experiments, where a prior model of the expected response cannot be posited, the sole option is to conduct an initial EDA. An EDA often discovers unanticipated behavior, allowing the experimenter to augment or even change the original hypothesis. In addition, the gross artifact behavior that EDA makes evident may aid the experimenter in deciding whether the data set is even usable, some additional preprocessing step is required, or the one used has introduced spurious effects. The proposed strategy, named EROICA for exploring regions of interest with cluster analysis, evolved from an empirical observation that a typical cluster of activation or artifact time series can be partitioned into three subsets: time series corrupted by significant trends and time series above and below some noise level. Moreover, the sought‐after common temporal behavior among the cluster time series can be extracted in an uncorrupted form from the above noise level time series alone. Thus, the key feature of EROICA is the initial partition of the data set into trendy and below the noise level time series, followed by the fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA) of the above the noise level time series to extract common cluster behavior patterns (centroids). The initial partition is based on a test statistic in the power spectrum domain. This step has significant ramifications: it greatly speeds up the FCA because of the much smaller number of time series to cluster; it makes the clustering results more robust because they are no longer affected by the trendy and noisy time series; the above the noise level time series can be further grouped according to the location of the spectral peak on the frequency axis, and these groups can be used to create a subset of initial centroids that greatly improves the convergence rate of the FCA; and the group of below the noise level time series (referred to as the noise pool) can be used as a data‐driven representation of the underlying noise source. In the final step, each time series is modeled as a linear combination of the closest centroid plus noise. The noise pool is very convenient for obtaining thresholds when testing the significance of the model parameter without having to model or assume the distributional properties of the underlying noise source. To limit the number of false positives in the activation maps, the significance test also tests the time series power spectrum values at the frequency locations determined by the cluster centroid. EROICA is one of the analysis options offered by the general image‐processing package EvIdent®. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson 16A: 50–62, 2003
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».