Rapid Quantification of Yeast Lipid using Microwave-Assisted Total Lipid Extraction and HPLC-CAD
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We here present simple and rapid methods for fast screening of yeast lipids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. First we introduced a microwave-assisted technique for fast lipid extraction that allows the extraction of lipids within 10 min. The new method enhances extraction rate by 27 times, while maintaining product yields comparable to conventional methods (n = 14, P > 0.05). The recovery (n = 3) from spiking of synthetic standards were 92 ± 6% for cholesterol, 95 ± 4% for triacylglycerol, and 92 ± 4% for free fatty acids. Additionally, the new extraction method combines cell disruption and extraction in one step, and the approach, therefore, not only greatly simplifies sample handling but also reduces analysis time and minimizes sample loss during sample preparation. Second, we developed a chromatographic separation that allowed separation of neutral and polar lipids from the extracted samples within a single run. The separation was performed based on a three gradient solvent system combined with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-HPLC followed by detection using a charged aerosol detector. The method was shown to be highly reproducible in terms of retention time of the analytes (intraday; 0.002-0.034% RSD; n = 10, interday; 0.04-1.35% RSD; n = 5) and peak area (intraday; 0.63-6% RSD; n = 10, interday; 4-12% RSD; n = 5).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it