MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978533014 · doi:10.1093/petrology/41.1.3

Liquidus Phase Relations in the System CaO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 at 2·0 GPa: Applications to Basalt Fractionation, Eclogites, and Igneous Sapphirine

2000· article· en· W1978533014 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Teh‐ching Liu, D. C. Presnall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquidusAnorthiteGeologyEnstatiteDiopsideGeochemistryPlagioclaseMineralogyFractional crystallization (geology)Igneous rockEclogiteSilicicBasaltQuartzPhase (matter)MeteoriteChemistryChondrite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To model magmatic crystallization processes for mafic to intermediate compositions at high pressure, liquidus phase relations in the forsterite–anorthite–diopside–silica (FADS) tetrahedron within the CaO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 system have been determined at 2·0 GPa. Compositions of five liquidus invariant points have been determined and the approximate compositions of five others have been inferred. These involve primary phase volumes for forsterite (fo), enstatite (en), diopside (di), high quartz (qz), spinel (sp), sapphirine (sa), garnet (gt), anorthite (an), and corundum (cor). The determined (with wt % coefficients) and inferred reactions (without coefficients) that define each isobaric invariant point are as follows: 23 en + 68 di + 9 sp = 84 liq + 16 fo 37 di + 63 sa = 47 liq + 40 sp + 13 en 100 gt = 21 liq + 27 sa + 55 en + 18 di 1 di + 59 en + 41 an = 43 liq + 57 gt 18 di + 21 qz + 15 en + 47 an = 100 liq di + an + gt = liq + sa an + gt = liq + sa + en sa + an + di = liq + sp sa + an = liq + cor + sp di + cor = liq + an + sp. These phase relations provide a diverse range of constraints on igneous processes at pressures near 2 GPa. They show that fractional crystallization of a model basalt gives a residual liquid strongly enriched in SiO2, strongly depleted in MgO, and mildly enriched in Al2O3. Such a trend is consistent with the calc-alkaline fractionation trend observed at subduction zones, but is in disagreement with suggestions that fractionation of tholeiitic basalt in this pressure range yields an alkalic basalt. Both trends may occur for natural basalts depending on the Na2O content of the parental magma. Also, the data show that the minimum pressure for the formation of cumulate eclogites and garnet pyroxenites is about 1·8–1·9 GPa. The lower limit of pressure at which sapphirine can crystallize from a liquid in the FADS tetrahedron is estimated to be 1·1–1·5 GPa and the upper limit is >3 GPa. Sapphirine crystallizes from magmas intermediate in composition between basalt and andesite. Probable igneous sapphirine in mafic associations is rare, but it occurs as part of a pyroxenite xenolith from Delegate, Australia, that we suggest is a cumulate assemblage and in a sapphirine norite at Wilson Lake, Labrador, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PetrologySame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207