Short-Latency Crossed Inhibitory Responses in Extensor Muscles During Locomotion in the Cat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During locomotion, contacting an obstacle generates a coordinated response involving flexion of the stimulated leg and activation of extensors contralaterally to ensure adequate support and forward progression. Activation of motoneurons innervating contralateral muscles (i.e., crossed extensor reflex) has always been described as an excitation, but the present paper shows that excitatory responses during locomotion are almost always preceded by a short period of inhibition. Data from seven cats chronically implanted with bipolar electrodes to record electromyography (EMG) of several hindlimb muscles bilaterally were used. A stimulating cuff electrode placed around the left tibial and left superficial peroneal nerves at the level of the ankle in five and two cats, respectively, evoked cutaneous reflexes during locomotion. During locomotion, short-latency ( approximately 13 ms) inhibitory responses were frequently observed in extensors of the right leg (i.e., contralateral to the stimulation), such as gluteus medius and triceps surae muscles, which were followed by excitatory responses ( approximately 25 ms). Burst durations of the left sartorius (Srt), a hip flexor, and ankle extensors of the right leg increased concomitantly in the mid- to late-flexion phases of locomotion with nerve stimulation. Moreover, the onset and offset of Srt and ankle extensor bursts bilaterally were altered in specific phases of the step cycle. Short-latency crossed inhibition in ankle extensors appears to be an integral component of cutaneous reflex pathways in intact cats during locomotion, which could be important in synchronizing EMG bursts in muscles of both legs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".