Markers of minor brain damage are associated with developmental performance in preschool children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(2002) Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 44, 323; Gosselin J, Amiel-Tison C, Infante-Rivard C, Fouron C, Fouron JC. . Minor neurological signs and developmental performances in high risk children at preschool age. . May; . : . –8. . [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: Is there a relationship between minor neurological signs and later developmental performance in high risk preschool children? Cohort study. One hospital in Montreal, Canada; January 1991 to June 1998. 72 preschool children at risk of poor development due to maternal placental insufficiency (documented with an abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocity waveform). Mean age 4 years (range 2–5 years); 53% female. Exclusion criteria were gestational age under 29 weeks at birth; families that did not speak French at home; location outside metropolitan area; chromosome disorders; congenital malformations; consanguinity, and evidence of socio-familial problems such as mental illness, drug addiction, receipt of welfare or physical abuse. A short neurological examination was used to assess neurological status. Participants were categorised as … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DDevelopmental%2Bmedicine%2Band%2Bchild%2Bneurology%26rft.stitle%253DDev%2BMed%2BChild%2BNeurol%26rft.aulast%253DGosselin%26rft.auinit1%253DJ.%26rft.volume%253D44%26rft.issue%253D5%26rft.spage%253D323%26rft.epage%253D328%26rft.atitle%253DMinor%2Bneurological%2Bsigns%2Band%2Bdevelopmental%2Bperformance%2Bin%2Bhigh%2Brisk%2Bchildren%2Bat%2Bpreschool%2Bage.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1017%252FS0012162201002158%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F12033718%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0012162201002158&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=12033718&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F6%2F1%2F19.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000175692600007&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".