MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978602122 · doi:10.1002/anie.200462103

Hetero‐Aggregate Compounds of Aryl and Alkyl Lithium Reagents: A Structurally Intriguing Aspect of Organolithium Chemistry

2005· article· en· W1978602122 on OpenAlexaff
Robert A. Gossage, Johann T. B. H. Jastrzebski, Gerard van Koten

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoordination Chemistry and Organometallics
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArylAlkylOrganolithium compoundsLithium (medication)ReagentChemistryAggregate (composite)Organic chemistryMaterials scienceNanotechnologyIonBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organolithium compounds are often depicted as mononuclear species. However, such compounds are in fact aggregated species and can form hetero-aggregates containing different organic groups, including heteroatom groups. In reactions involving organolithium reagents, the "pure" homo-aggregate organolithium compound can change into a hetero-aggregate, which has a different structure and reactivity to the homo-aggregate. This fact is often overlooked. When there are chiral centers in the organolithium reagent or the substrate, diastereoselective self-assembly (the preferential formation of a particular diastereoisomeric aggregate) plays a role. The importance of these contributions in understanding the structure and reactivity patterns of organolithium reagents is the focus of this Minireview.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicCoordination Chemistry and OrganometallicsFrench-language works237,207