MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978658135 · doi:10.1080/09503110.2014.956487

The Performing Arts in Medieval Islam: Shadow Play and Popular Poetry in Ibn Dāniyāl's Mamluk Cairo

2014· article· en· W1978658135 on OpenAlex
Marcus Milwright

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAl-Masāq · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShadow (psychology)PoetryMamlukIslamArabic literatureArabicArtArt historyHistoryLiteratureTheologyPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1Paul Kahle ed., Three Shadow Plays by Muḥammad Ibn Dāniyāl, with a critical apparatus by Derek Hopwood and prepared for publication by Derek Hopwood and Mustafa Badawi. E. J. W. Gibb Memorial, New Series 32 (Cambridge, 1992).2Amendments to the Kahle edition of Ibn Daniyal appear in the reviews of Paul Kahle ed., Three Shadow Plays by Muḥammad Ibn Dāniyāl, with a critical apparatus by Derek Hopwood and prepared for publication by Derek Hopwood and Mustafa Badawi. E. J. W. Gibb Memorial, New Series 32 (Cambridge, 1992).3Everett Rowson, Journal of the American Oriental Society 114.3 (1994): 462–66; Shmuel Moreh, Die Welt des Islams 34.1 (1994): 126–29.4Francesco Corrao, Il riso, il comico e la festa al Cairo nel XIII secolo: il teatro delle ombre di Ibn Daniyal (Rome, 1996); René Khawam, Le marriage de l'emir conjonctif (Paris, 1997).5Paul Kahle, “The Arabic shadow Play in medieval Egypt (old Texts and old Figures),” Journal of the Pakistan Historical Society, April 1954 (Karachi), 85–115. For the translation, see 98–115.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it