Intestinal Disappearance and Mesenteric and Portal Appearance of Amino Acids in Dairy Cows Fed Ruminally Protected Methionine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experiment was conducted to compare the rates of disappearance of amino acids (AA) from the small intestine and their net appearance in the blood draining only the small intestine (mesenteric-drained viscera) and the whole gastrointestinal tract (portal-drained viscera) of cows fed a silage-based diet supplemented or not with ruminally protected Met. Five lactating dairy cows (118+/-4 DIM) equipped with duodenal and ileal cannulae (n = 2) or a duodenal cannula only (n = 3), two of which were multicatheterized, were fed a TMR top dressed with 0 or 72 g of ruminally protected Met per day. The addition of ruminally protected Met to the diet increased the duodenal flux of Met leading to a higher apparent digestibility of Met in the small intestine. Sixty-six percent of Met from ruminally protected Met bypassed the rumen and 82% of that Met disappeared from the small intestine. Arterial plasma Met concentrations numerically increased with ruminally protected Met (45 vs. 18 microM), while total AA concentration decreased. Feeding ruminally protected Met resulted in higher concentrations of urea-N and glucose in arterial plasma. Milk production and milk composition were unaffected. The disappearance of essential AA across the small intestine was equivalent (101%) to their flux through the mesenteric-drained viscera while the portal:mesenteric-drained viscera flux ratio for each essential AA varied from 38% for Thr to 76% for Phe. The portal:mesenteric-drained viscera flux ratio for Met was 66%. These results confirm observations made with pigs and sheep.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".