MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978724242 · doi:10.1017/s0043933907001444

Vitamin requirements: is there basis for re-evaluating dietary specifications?

2007· article· en· W1978724242 on OpenAlex
S. Leeson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld s Poultry Science Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitaminBroilerBiologyVitamin EBiotechnologyDietary Reference IntakeFood scienceNutrientAnimal scienceAntioxidantEcologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThere has been little work conducted over the last 40 years on estimating vitamin requirements of poultry, and so consequently NRC (1994) values are still often quoted as standards. A review of this information indicates many values are estimates, or extrapolated from comparable species, or as with broiler breeders, simply not given. The current concern related to formulating vitamin levels in poultry diets is the assumption that change in genetic potential of layers and meat birds necessitates re-evaluation, and that parameters for assessing needs are now more complex than simple production metrics as used previously. Unfortunately information on maintenance needs for vitamins is lacking, and while there is now information available on vitamin content of eggs, comprehensive details of the vitamin level in poultry meat products is surprising lacking. With unprecedented egg output of modern layer strains, and ever improving feed efficiency in meat birds, vitamin intake per unit of output is continually declining. For layers the estimate is around a 1% yearly decline in vitamin intake per egg produced, while for meat birds there has been a 0.6-0.8% yearly decline per kg body gain. This reduced intake of vitamins is the basis for improved performance in layers and meat birds fed a higher than normal level of vitamins. However, an even more important basis for reevaluating vitamin needs is change in measurement criteria. Many vitamins and especially the fat soluble vitamins accumulate in eggs and meat in proportion to diet inclusion. Development of vitamin enriched designer poultry products therefore dictates elevated feeding levels of vitamins. Co-incidentally, increased levels of vitamin E in poultry products has led to the realization that increased antioxidant capacity of these tissues enhances shelf life and appearance. Of greatest impact in reevaluating diet vitamin specifications has been the effect of these nutrients on bird health and in particular immune response. For example dietary levels of vitamin E far in excess of NRC (1994) requirements have been shown to positively impact immune response in all ages of bird and also the performance of heat-stressed birds. Expectations of ever increasing performance dictate the need for continual reevaluation in determining vitamin levels within diet formulations as detailed in recent publications on optimum vitamin nutrition of poultry to improve health, welfare, performance and the quality of poultry products.Keywords: vitaminnutraceuticalimmune responsedesigner poultry products

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it