The Adolescent Pilon Fracture: Management and Outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pilon fractures in the adolescent are complicated by the presence of the adjacent physis. These fractures usually result from high-energy trauma, frequently associated with soft-tissue trauma, further potentiating treatment difficulties. Although rare, such fractures are associated with a high complication rate, including physeal arrest. It was the objective of this review to increase awareness of this fracture pattern in the adolescent, to determine the types of complications in this difficult group, and to develop a treatment plan to improve the outcome of treatment. Seven children, with a total of eight pilon fractures were treated at a major pediatric tertiary referral center over the past 10 years. The average age of the children was 15 years 10 months (range, 13 years 6 months to 17 years 7 months). The average length of follow-up was 16 months (range, 3 months and 3 years 10 months). There were three Reudi type II equivalent fractures and two Reudi type III equivalent injuries. Three fractures did not fit the Reudi classification system as there was an associated ankle dislocation. All fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. There were two cases of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and one physeal arrest. Results were good to excellent in 63% of cases. A new classification system for pediatric pilon fractures has been proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".