A histological and radiological investigation of the nasal bone in fetuses with Down syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Previous studies of nasal bone development in Down syndrome have used radiographs or ultrasound for the detection of nasal bone length or nasal bone absence. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence and size of the nasal bones in postmortem Down syndrome fetuses by means of radiographs and histological examination. METHODS: Thirty-three aborted human fetuses (gestational age 14-25 weeks) with Down syndrome were included. A mid-sagittal tissue block was excised from the skull base to the foramen magnum and along the lateral aspect of the spine. Radiographs of the tissue block were taken in lateral, frontal and axial projections. The length of the nasal bone was measured. The tissue blocks were cut in serial sections and stained. The crown-rump length (CRL), foot length (FL) and number of ossified bones in the hand and foot (CNO) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 8/33 fetuses had bilateral nasal bone absence and two had unilateral absence. In fetuses with radiographically diagnosed nasal bone absence, no nasal bone could be found histologically. The majority of the Down syndrome fetuses had CRL, FL and CNO values within the range of those for normal age-matched fetuses. Nasal bone length was normal or reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of the nasal bone was registered by postmortem examination in one-third of fetuses with Down syndrome. In some fetuses this could be a result of delayed maturation associated with Down syndrome. The phenotypic differences in nasal bone appearance may reflect genotypic differences in the Down syndrome group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.055 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".