MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978865983 · doi:10.1248/bpb.31.1663

Effect of Dexamethasone on STAT6-Dependent Ym1/2 Expression in Vivo and in Vitro

2008· article· en· W1978865983 on OpenAlexaff
Eunkyung Lee, Meihua Jin, Zhejiu Quan, Nam Kyung Hwang, Chang Lin, Sang-Gu Kang, Tae Chul Moon, Hyeun Wook Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicStudies on Chitinases and Chitosanases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMinistry of Education and Human Resources Development
KeywordsDexamethasoneIn vivoIn vitroSTAT6OvalbuminBronchoalveolar lavageInterleukin 4MedicineImmunologyInternal medicineMolecular biologyLungEndocrinologyBiologyCytokineBiochemistryImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ym1 and Ym2 (Ym1/2) are chitinase-like proteins and we reported previously that IL-4 induced Ym1/2 in mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells. In the present study, ovalbumin-induced asthmatic mice were used to investigate the effect of glucocorticoids on Ym1/2 expression. Ym1/2 were highly induced in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and the lung. Ym1/2 expression was completely inhibited by dexamethasone (Dex) in BALF and weakly inhibited in the lung. Primary cultured macrophages were used to investigate the inhibition of Ym1/2 expression at the cellular level. Although Dex pretreatment inhibited the Ym1/2 expression level in an animal model, it did not reduce IL-4 induction of Ym1/2 expression in vitro. Next, we tested whether Dex blocks IL-4 induced STAT6 signaling and found that it had no inhibitory effect on the phosphorylation level of STAT6 in macrophages. The luciferase reporter assay also revealed that Dex did not inhibit IL-4 induction of Ym1/2 promoter activity. These results indicate that the inhibitory effect of Dex on Ym1/2 protein expression in the murine model of asthma does not involve the STAT6 signaling pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological and Pharmaceutical BulletinSame topicStudies on Chitinases and ChitosanasesFrench-language works237,207