MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978867062 · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.014

Tet3 CXXC Domain and Dioxygenase Activity Cooperatively Regulate Key Genes for Xenopus Eye and Neural Development

2012· article· en· W1978867062 on OpenAlexafffund
Yufei Xu, Chao Xu, Akiko Kato, W. Tempel, José G. Abreu, Chuanbing Bian, Yeguang Hu, Di Hu, Bin Zhao, T. Cerovina, Jianbo Diao, Feizhen Wu, Housheng Hansen He, Qingyan Cui, Erin Clark, Chun Ma, A. Malynn Barbara, Gert Jan C. Veenstra, Guoliang Xu, Ursula B. Kaiser, X. Shirley Liu, Stephen P. Sugrue, Xi He, Jinrong Min, Yoichi Kato, Yujiang Geno Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueCell · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsStructural Genomics ConsortiumUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Eye InstituteIntellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterBiological and Environmental ResearchConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoOntario Genomics InstituteWellcome TrustNational Institutes of HealthOntario GenomicsGenome CanadaOntario Innovation TrustUniversity of ChicagoPfizerFudan UniversityArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyBrigham and Women's HospitalEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsBiologyDNA methylationRegulation of gene expressionGeneXenopusPromoterTranscription factorCell biologyEpigeneticsGeneticsRegulatorDNA demethylationGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations271
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCellSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207