Prospective Evaluation of Sacral Nerve Modulation in Children with Validated Questionnaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sacral neuromodulation for refractory urinary dysfunction in pediatrics shows promising results. We prospectively evaluated patients undergoing sacral neuromodulation using validated quality of life and bladder dysfunction questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. Two validated questionnaires were completed preoperatively, after lead placement and at all followups. The PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scale, which assesses quality of life and bladder dysfunction, was quantified using the Vancouver Nonneurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction/Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome (NLUTD/DES) questionnaire. The Wilcoxon matched pairs test was used for statistical analysis with p <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients with a median age of 10 years were enrolled in the study. Median followup was 6 months. All patients underwent generator placement. No significant difference was seen in physical quality of life. Before and after lead placement mean ± SD psychosocial quality of life scores were 70.6 ± 17.4 and 81.43 ± 14.8 (p = 0.02), mean total quality of life scores were 75 ± 15.3 and 84.04 ± 13.2 (p = 0.006) and median NLUTD/DES scores were 23 ± 7.8 and 10.5 ± 7.0 (p <0.001), respectively. One month postoperatively a significant difference was seen in total quality of life and NLUTD/DES scores. Two patients required replacement of the temporary lead or generator. There were no infections. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing sacral neuromodulation had significant improvement in NLUTD/DES scores, and psychosocial and overall total quality of life. Results were durable at 1 month. Continuing to follow these patients in a prospective manner with validated questionnaires will strengthen the current evidence supporting sacral neuromodulation in the pediatric population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".