MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979009583 · doi:10.1117/12.815524

Smart structures using shape memory alloys

2009· article· en· W1979009583 on OpenAlexaff
John Murray Cordell Clarke, Solomon Tesfamariam, S. Yannacopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Sensitivity (control systems)Linear-quadratic regulatorShape-memory alloyDisplacement (psychology)Structural engineeringSmart materialNoise (video)CasingControl systemComputer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elevated civil structure systems, such as communication towers and water tanks, are prone to higher mode vibration and earthquake induced damages. To mitigate damages, however, the structures are retrofitted with conventional (e.g. steel casing) and/or emerging techniques (e.g. smart structures). Smart structure entails integration of system behavior, control design and actuators. In this paper, utility of smart structures is illustrated through an elevated water tank concrete column. The concrete column is modeled as a continuous system, using the Lagrangian formulation, and linear quadratic regulator (LQR) is used for the control system, and shape memory alloy (SMA) for actuation. The water tank is excited with the 1940 El-Centro earthquake record. A sensitivity analysis is performed on the controller error and penalizing constants, as well as actuator location and angle of the connection. The four control variables that can be analyzed for the controller are: Rr, Qr, Re, and Qe, which are the control penalty, error penalty, measurement noise and process noise, respectively. The connection height on the beam and angle of the actuator is also analyzed for optimal performance. From the sensitivity analysis, the most efficient controller configuration is identified for further analysis of the structure. Optimal actuator configuration can be found based on the reduction of displacement versus the amount of energy used. It has been shown that using the SMA, the seismic demand on the concrete column is reduced using the SMA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207