Architecture of the catalytic HPN motif is conserved in all E2 conjugating enzymes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
E2 conjugating enzymes are the central enzymes in the ubiquitination pathway and are responsible for the transfer of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins on to target substrates. The secondary structural elements of the catalytic domain of these enzymes is highly conserved, including the sequence conservation of a three-residue HPN (His-Pro-Asn) motif located upstream of the active-site cysteine residue used for ubiquitin conjugation. Despite the vast structural knowledge of E2 enzymes, the catalytic mechanism of these enzymes remains poorly understood, in large part due to variation in the arrangements of the residues in the HPN motif in existing E2 structures. In the present study, we used the E2 enzyme HIP2 to probe the structures of the HPN motif in several other E2 enzymes. A combination of chemical-shift analysis, determination of the histidine protonation states and amide temperature coefficients were used to determine the orientation of the histidine ring and hydrogen-bonding arrangements within the HPN motif. Unlike many three-dimensional structures, we found that a conserved hydrogen bond between the histidine imidazole ring and the asparagine backbone amide proton, a common histidine protonation state, and a common histidine orientation exists for all E2 enzymes examined. These results indicate that the histidine within the HPN motif is orientated to structurally stabilize a tight turn motif in all E2 enzymes and is not orientated to interact with the asparagine side chain as proposed in some mechanisms. These results suggest that a common catalysis mechanism probably exists for all E2 conjugating enzymes to facilitate ubiquitin transfer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".