MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979035381 · doi:10.1109/papcon.2007.4286283

Electrical Testing of Low and Medium Voltage Motors

2007· article· en· W1979035381 on OpenAlexaff
G.C. Stone, Ian Culbert

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Conference record of annual Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Power Generation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic coilStatorReliability engineeringInduction motorReliability (semiconductor)Partial dischargeEngineeringRotor (electric)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve motor reliability and move to predictive maintenance for motors, tools are needed to assess the condition of the windings. There are several old and new test methods that have gained popularity with AC squirrel cage induction motor maintenance specialists. These include: ldr current signature analysis ldr growler ldr insulation resistance and polarization index ldr surge testing ldr partial discharge testing. The first two are applicable to find rotor winding problems, while the rest are intended for the stator winding. Each of these tests is critically examined and evaluated for: effectiveness; which windings/types of machines the test is effective; limitations; ease of performance and ease of interpretation. Recent changes to relevant IEEE and IEC standards concerning these tests are also highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Conference record of annual Pulp and Paper Industry Technical ConferenceSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207